U.S. Appeals Court Upholds Verdict in E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case Against Trump

 U.S. Appeals Court Upholds Verdict in E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case Against Trump.

U.S. Appeals Court Upholds Verdict in E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case Against Trump.

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the verdict in the defamation case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll against former President Donald Trump. The decision reinforces a lower court’s ruling that Trump was liable for defamatory statements made about Carroll, who accused him of sexual assault.

Case Background

E. Jean Carroll, a former advice columnist, alleged that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s. After going public with her claims in 2019, Trump denied the allegations, stating she fabricated the story to boost book sales. Carroll subsequently filed a defamation lawsuit, arguing that Trump’s statements damaged her reputation.

Trial and Verdict

In a civil trial earlier this year, a jury found Trump liable for defamation and awarded Carroll substantial damages. The court ruled that Trump’s comments were not protected by presidential immunity, as they were made outside the scope of his official duties.

Appeals Court Decision

Trump’s legal team appealed the verdict, asserting that his statements were part of his official capacity as president. However, the appeals court rejected this argument, affirming that his remarks were personal in nature and not shielded by presidential immunity. The court’s decision upholds the jury’s finding of liability and the damages awarded to Carroll.

Implications of the Ruling

The appeals court’s decision sets a precedent for holding public figures accountable for defamatory statements, even if they hold or have held high office. It also underscores the judiciary’s role in ensuring accountability and justice for individuals who come forward with credible claims.

Response from Both Parties

• E. Jean Carroll: Carroll expressed gratitude for the court’s decision, stating it was a victory for truth and justice.
• Donald Trump: Trump continues to deny the allegations and has labeled the case a politically motivated attack.

The case marks a significant legal and cultural milestone, highlighting the enduring importance of defamation law in addressing reputational harm. As the legal battle unfolds, it continues to resonate beyond the courtroom, contributing to broader discussions about accountability and justice.